History of Hinduism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search

History of Hinduism denotes a wide variety of related religious traditions native to the Indian subcontinent notably in modern-day Nepal and India.[1] Its history overlaps or coincides with the development of religion in Indian subcontinent since the Iron Age, with some of its traditions tracing back to prehistoric religions such as those of the Bronze Age Indus Valley Civilization. It has thus been called the “oldest religion” in the world.[note 1] Scholars regard Hinduism as a synthesis[11][12][13] of various Indian cultures and traditions,[12][14][11] with diverse roots[15] and no single founder.[16][note 2]
The history of Hinduism is often divided into periods of development, with the first period being that of the historical Vedic religiondated from about 1900 BCE to 1400 BCE.[22][note 3] The subsequent period, between 800 BCE and 200 BCE, is “a turning point between the Vedic religion and Hindu religions”,[25] and a formative period for Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism. The Epic and Early Puranic period, from c. 200 BCE to 500 CE, saw the classical “Golden Age” of Hinduism (c. 320-650 CE), which coincides with the Gupta Empire. In this period the six branches of Hindu philosophy evolved, namely SamkhyaYogaNyayaVaisheshikaMīmāṃsā, and Vedanta. Monotheistic sects like Shaivism and Vaishnavism developed during this same period through the Bhakti movement. The period from roughly 650 to 1100 CE forms the late Classical period[26] or early Middle Ages, in which classical Puranic Hinduism is established, and Adi Shankara‘s Advaita Vedanta, which incorporated Buddhist thought into Vedanta, marking a shift from realistic to idealistic thought.
Hinduism under both Hindu and Islamic rulers from c. 1200 to 1750 CE,[27][28] saw the increasing prominence of the Bhakti movement, which remains influential today. The colonial period saw the emergence of various Hindu reform movements partly inspired by western movements, such as Unitarianism and Theosophy. The Partition of India in 1947 was along religious lines, with the Republic of Indiaemerging with a Hindu majority. During the 20th century, due to the Indian diaspora, Hindu minorities have formed in all continents, with the largest communities in absolute numbers in the United States and the United Kingdom. In the Republic of India, Hindu nationalism has emerged as a strong political force since the 1980s, the Bharatiya Janata Party forming the Government of India from 1999 to 2004, and its first state government in South India in 2006, and also the Narendra Modi led Government from 2014.

Roots of Hinduism[edit]

Western scholars regard Hinduism as a fusion[11][note 4] or synthesis[12][note 5] of various Indian cultures and traditions.[12][note 6] Among its roots are the historical Vedic religion of Iron Age India [29][14] itself already the product of “a composite of the Indo-Aryan and Harappan cultures and civilizations”,[30][note 7] but also the Sramana[21] or renouncer traditions[14] of northeast India,[21] and mesolithic[31] and neolithic[32] cultures of India, such as the religions of the Indus Valley Civilisation,[33] Dravidian traditions,[34] and the local traditions[14] and tribal religions.[35]
After the Vedic period, between 500[12]-200[36] BCE and c. 300 CE,[12] at the beginning of the “Epic and Puranic” c.q. “Preclassical” period, the “Hindu synthesis” emerged,[12][36]which incorporated śramaṇic[36][37] and Buddhist influences[36][38] and the emerging bhakti tradition into the Brahmanical fold via the smriti literature.[39][36] This synthesis emerged under the pressure of the success of Buddhism and Jainism.[40] During the Gupta reign the first Puranas were written,[41][note 8] which were used to disseminate “mainstream religious ideology amongst pre-literate and tribal groups undergoing acculturation.”[41] The resulting Puranic Hinduism differed markedly from the earlier Brahmanism of the Dharmaśāstras and the smritis.[41][note 9] Hinduism co-existed for several centuries with Buddhism,[42] to finally gain the upper hand at all levels in the 8th century.[43][web 1][note 10]
From northern India this “Hindu synthesis”, and its societal divisions, spread to southern India and parts of Southeast Asia.[44][note 11][note 12][note 13] It was aided by the settlement of Brahmins on land granted by local rulers,[45][46] the incorporation and assimilation of popular non-Vedic gods,[web 2][47][note 14] and the process of Sanskritization, in which “people from many strata of society throughout the subcontinent tended to adapt their religious and social life to Brahmanic norms”.[web 2][note 15][48] This process of assimilation explains the wide diversity of local cultures in India “half shrouded in a taddered cloak of conceptual unity.”[49]


James Mill (1773–1836), in his The History of British India (1817), distinguished three phases in the history of India, namely Hindu, Muslim and British civilisations. This periodisation has been criticised, for the misconceptions it has given rise to. Another periodisation is the division into “ancient, classical, medieval and modern periods”, although this periodization has also received criticism.[50]
Romila Thapar notes that the division of Hindu-Muslim-British periods of Indian history gives too much weight to “ruling dynasties and foreign invasions,”[51] neglecting the social-economic history which often showed a strong continuity.[51] The division in Ancient-Medieval-Modern overlooks the fact that the Muslim-conquests took place between the eight and the fourteenth century, while the south was never completely conquered.[51] According to Thapar, a periodisation could also be based on “significant social and economic changes,” which are not strictly related to a change of ruling powers.[52][note 16]
Smart and Michaels seem to follow Mill’s periodisation, while Flood and Muesse follow the “ancient, classical, medieval and modern periods” periodisation. An elaborate periodisation may be as follows:[26]

  • Pre-history and Indus Valley Civilisation (until c. 1750 BCE);
  • Vedic period (c. 1750-500 BCE);
  • “Second Urbanisation” (c. 600-200 BCE);
  • Classical Period (c. 200 BCE-1200 CE);[note 17]
  • Pre-classical period (c. 200 BCE-300 CE);
  • “Golden Age” (Gupta Empire) (c. 320-650 CE);
  • Late-Classical period (c. 650-1200 CE);
  • Medieval Period (c. 1200-1500 CE);
  • Early Modern Period (c. 1500-1850);
  • Modern period (British Raj and independence) (from c. 1850).
showHistory of Hinduism

Prevedic religions (until c. 1750 BCE)[edit]


The earliest prehistoric religion in India that may have left its traces in Hinduism comes from mesolithic as observed in the sites such as the rock paintings of Bhimbetka rock shelters dating to a period of 30,000 BCE or older,[note 18] as well as neolithic times.[note 19] Some of the religious practices can be considered to have originated in 4,000 BCE. Several tribal religions still exist, though “[w]e must not assume that there are many similarities between prehistoric and contemporary tribal communities”.[web 3]

Indus Valley Civilization (c. 3300–1700 BCE)[edit]

The so-called Shiva Pashupatiseal from Indus Valley Civilization

Some Indus valley seals show swastikas, which are found in other religions worldwide. Phallic symbols interpreted as the much later Hindu linga have been found in the Harappan remains.[53][54]

Swastika Seals from the Indus Valley Civilization preserved at the British Museum

Many Indus valley seals show animals. One seal shows a horned figure seated in a posture reminiscent of the Lotus position and surrounded by animals was named by early excavators “Pashupati“, an epithet of the later Hindu gods Shiva and Rudra.[55][56][57] Writing in 1997, Doris Meth Srinivasan said, “Not too many recent studies continue to call the seal’s figure a “Proto-Siva,” rejecting thereby Marshall’s package of proto-Shiva features, including that of three heads. She interprets what John Marshall interpreted as facial as not human but more bovine, possibly a divine buffalo-man.[58] According to Iravatham Mahadevan, symbols 47 and 48 of his Indus script glossary The Indus Script: Texts, Concordance and Tables (1977), representing seated human-like figures, could describe the South Indian deity Murugan.[59]
In view of the large number of figurines found in the Indus valley, some scholars believe that the Harappan people worshipped a mother goddess symbolizing fertility, a common practice among rural Hindus even today.[60] However, this view has been disputed by S. Clark who sees it as an inadequate explanation of the function and construction of many of the figurines.[61]
There are no religious buildings or evidence of elaborate burials… If there were temples, they have not been identified.[62] However, House – 1 in HR-A area in Mohenjadaro’s Lower Town has been identified as a possible temple.[63]

Vedic period (c. 1750–500 BCE)[edit]

The commonly proposed period of earlier Vedic age is dated back to 2nd millennium BCE.[64] Vedism was the sacrificial religion of the early Indo-Aryans, speakers of early Old Indic dialects, ultimately deriving from the Proto-Indo-Iranian peoples of the Bronze Age.[note 20]


The Vedic period, named after the Vedic religion of the Indo-Aryans,[65][note 21] lasted from c. 1750 to 500 BCE.[66][note 22] The Indo-Aryans were a branch of the Indo-European language family, which many scholars believe originated in Kurgan culture of the Central Asiansteppes.[67][68][note 23][note 24] Indeed, the Vedic religion, including the names of certain deities, was in essence a branch of the same religious tradition as the ancient Greeks, Romans, Persians, and Germanic peoples. For example, the Vedic god Dyaus Pita is a variant of the Proto-Indo-European god *Dyēus ph2ter (or simply *Dyēus), from which also derive the Greek Zeus and the Roman Jupiter. Similarly the Vedic Manu and Yama derive from the PIE *Manu and *Yemo, from which also derive the Germanic Mannus and Ymir.
According the Indo-European migration theory, the Indo-Iranians were the common ancestor of the Indo-Aryans and the Proto-Iranians. The Indo-Iranians split into the Indo-Aryans and Iranians around 1800-1600 BC.[69]
The Indo-Aryans were pastoralists[70] who migrated into north-western India after the collapse of the Indus Valley Civilization,[71][72][73][note 25] The Indo-Aryans were a branch of the Indo-Iranians, which originated in the Andronovo culture[74] in the BactriaMargiana era, in present northern Afghanistan.[75] The roots of this culture go back further to the Sintashta culture, with funeral sacrifices which show close parallels to the sacrificial funeral rites of the Rig Veda.[76]
During the Early Vedic period (c. 1500 – 1100 BCE[70]) Vedic tribes were pastoralists in north-west India.[77] After 1100 BCE, with the introduction of iron, the Vedic tribes moved into the western Ganges Plain, adapting an agrarian lifestyle.[70][78][79] Rudimentary state-forms appeared, of which the Kuru-tribe and realm was the most influential.[70][80] It was a tribal union, which developed into the first recorded state-level society in South Asia around 1000 BCE.[70] It decisively changed the Vedic heritage of the early Vedic period, collecting the Vedic hymns into collections, and developing new rituals which gained their position in Indian civilization as the orthodox srauta rituals,[70] which contributed to the so-called “classical synthesis”[81] or “Hindu synthesis”.[12]

Rigvedic religion[edit]

The Indo-Aryans brought with them their language[82] and religion.[83][84] The Vedic beliefs and practices of the pre-classical era were closely related to the hypothesised Proto-Indo-European religion,[85] and the Indo-Iranian religion.[86] According to Anthony, the Old Indic religion probably emerged among Indo-European immigrants in the contact zone between the Zeravshan River (present-day Uzbekistan) and (present-day) Iran.[87] It was “a syncretic mixture of old Central Asian and new Indo-European elements”,[87] which borrowed “distinctive religious beliefs and practices”[86] from the Bactria–Margiana Culture.[86] At least 383 non-Indo-European words were borrowed from this culture, including the god Indra and the ritual drink Soma.[88] According to Anthony,

Many of the qualities of Indo-Iranian god of might/victory, Verethraghna, were transferred to the adopted god Indra, who became the central deity of the developing Old Indic culture. Indra was the subject of 250 hymns, a quarter of the Rig Veda. He was associated more than any other deity with Soma, a stimulant drug (perhaps derived from Ephedra) probably borrowed from the BMAC religion. His rise to prominence was a peculiar trait of the Old Indic speakers.[75]

The oldest inscriptions in Old Indic, the language of the Rig Veda, are found not in northwestern India and Pakistan, but in northern Syria, the location of the Mitanni kingdom.[89]The Mitanni kings took Old Indic throne names, and used Old Indic technical terms were used for horse-riding and chariot-driving.[89] The Old Indic term r’ta, meaning “cosmic order and truth”, the central concept of the Rig Veda, was also employed in the mitanni kingdom.[89] And Old Indic gods, including Indra, were also known in the Mitanni kingdom.[90][91][92]
Their religion was further developed when they migrated into the Ganges Plain after c. 1100 BCE and became settled farmers,[70][93][94] further syncretising with the native cultures of northern India.[81] The Vedic religion of the later Vedic period co-existed with local religions, such as the Yaksha cults,[81][95][web 4] and was itself the product of “a composite of the indo-Aryan and Harappan cultures and civilizations”.[30][note 7] David Gordon White cites three other mainstream scholars who “have emphatically demonstrated” that Vedic religion is partially derived from the Indus Valley Civilizations.[96] [note 7]


Its liturgy is preserved in the three Vedic Samhitas: the Rig-VedaSama-Veda and the Yajur-Veda. The Vedic texts were the texts of the elite, and do not necessarily represent popular ideas or practices.[97] Of these, the Rig-Veda is the oldest, a collection of hymns composed between ca. 1500-1200 BCE.[98][99][75] The other two add ceremonial detail for the performance of the actual sacrifice. The Atharva-Veda may also contain compositions dating to before 1000 BCE. It contains material pertinent to domestic ritual and folk magicof the period.
These texts, as well as the voluminous commentary on orthopraxy collected in the Brahmanas compiled during the early 1st millennium BCE, were transmitted by oral traditionalone until the advent, in the 4th century AD, of the Pallava and Gupta period and by a combination of written and oral tradition since then.
The Hindu samskaras

…go back to a hoary antiquity. The Vedas, the Brahmanas, the Grhyasutras, the Dharmasutras, the Smritis and other treatises describe the rites, ceremonies and customs.[100]

The earliest text of the Vedas is the Rigveda,[101] a collection of poetic hymns used in the sacrificial rites of Vedic priesthood. Many Rigvedic hymns concern the fire ritual(Agnihotra) and especially the offering of Soma to the gods (Somayajna). Soma is both an intoxicant and a god itself, as is the sacrificial fire, Agni. The royal horse sacrifice(Ashvamedha) is a central rite in the Yajurveda.
The gods in the Rig-Veda are mostly personified concepts, who fall into two categories: the devas – who were gods of nature – such as the weather deity Indra (who is also the King of the gods), Agni (“fire”), Usha (“dawn”), Surya (“sun”) and Apas (“waters”) on the one hand, and on the other hand the asuras – gods of moral concepts – such as Mitra(“contract”), Aryaman (guardian of guest, friendship and marriage), Bhaga (“share”) or Varuna, the supreme Asura (or Aditya). While Rigvedic deva is variously applied to most gods, including many of the Asuras, the Devas are characterised as Younger Gods while Asuras are the Older Gods (pūrve devāḥ). In later Vedic texts, the Asuras become demons.
The Rigveda has 10 Mandalas (‘books’). There is significant variation in the language and style between the family books (RV books 2–7), book 8, the “Soma Mandala” (RV 9), and the more recent books 1 and 10. The older books share many aspects of common Indo-Iranian religion, and is an important source for the reconstruction of earlier common Indo-European traditions. Especially RV 8 has striking similarity to the Avesta,[102] containing allusions to Afghan Flora and Fauna,[103] e.g. to camels (úṣṭra- = Avestan uštra). Many of the central religious terms in Vedic Sanskrit have cognates in the religious vocabulary of other Indo-European languages (deva: Latin deushotar: Germanic godasura: Germanic ansuzyajna: Greek hagiosbrahman: Norse Bragi or perhaps Latin flamen etc.). In the Avesta, Asura (Ahura) is considered good and Devas (Daevas) are considered evil entities, quite the opposite of the Rig Veda.

Cosmic order[edit]

Ethics in the Vedas are based on the concepts of Satya and Rta. Satya is the principle of integration rooted in the Absolute.[104] Ṛta is the expression of Satya, which regulates and coordinates the operation of the universe and everything within it.[105] Conformity with Ṛta would enable progress whereas its violation would lead to punishment. Panikkar remarks:

Ṛta is the ultimate foundation of everything; it is “the supreme”, although this is not to be understood in a static sense. […] It is the expression of the primordial dynamism that is inherent in everything….”[106]

The term “dharma” was already used in Brahmanical thought, where it was conceived as an aspect of Rta.[107] The term rta is also known from the Proto-Indo-Iranian religion, the religion of the Indo-Iranian peoples prior to the earliest Vedic (Indo-Aryan) and Zoroastrian (Iranian) scriptures. Asha[pronunciation?] (aša) is the Avestan language term corresponding to Vedic language ṛta.[108]


The 9th and 8th centuries BCE witnessed the composition of the earliest Upanishads.[109]:183 Upanishads form the theoretical basis of classical Hinduism and are known as Vedanta (conclusion of the Veda).[110] The older Upanishads launched attacks of increasing intensity on the rituals, however, a philosophical and allegorical meaning is also given to these rituals. In some later Upanishads there is a spirit of accommodation towards rituals. The tendency which appears in the philosophical hymns of the Vedas to reduce the number of gods to one principle becomes prominent in the Upanishads.[111] The diverse monistic speculations of the Upanishads were synthesised into a theistic framework by the sacred Hindu scripture Bhagavad Gita.[112]


In Iron Age India, during a period roughly spanning the 10th to 6th centuries BCE, the Mahajanapadas arise from the earlier petty kingdoms of the various Rigvedic tribes, and the failing remnants of the Late Harappan culture. In this period the mantra portions of the Vedas are largely completed, and a flowering industry of Vedic priesthood organised in numerous schools (shakha) develops exegetical literature, viz. the Brahmanas. These schools also edited the Vedic mantra portions into fixed recensions, that were to be preserved purely by oral tradition over the following two millennia.

Second Urbanisation (c. 600–200 BCE)[edit]

Upanishads and shramana movements[edit]

Increasing urbanisation of India in the 7th and 6th centuries BCE led to the rise of new ascetic or sramana movements which challenged the orthodoxy of rituals.[113] Mahavira (c. 549–477 BCE), proponent of Jainism, and Buddha (c. 563-483 BCE), founder of Buddhism, were the most prominent icons of this movement.[109]:184 According to Heinrich Zimmer, Jainism and Buddhism are part of the pre-Vedic heritage, which also includes Samkhya and Yoga:

[Jainism] does not derive from Brahman-Aryan sources, but reflects the cosmology and anthropology of a much older pre-Aryan upper class of northeastern India – being rooted in the same subsoil of archaic metaphysical speculation as Yoga, Sankhya, and Buddhism, the other non-Vedic Indian systems.[114][note 26]

The Sramana tradition in part created the concept of the cycle of birth and death, the concept of samsara, and the concept of liberation, which became characteristic for Hinduism.[note 27]
Pratt notes that Oldenberg (1854-1920), Neumann (1865-1915) and Radhakrishnan (1888-1975) believed that the Buddhist canon had been influenced by Upanishads, while la Vallee Poussin thinks the influence was nihil, and “Eliot and several others insist that on some points the Buddha was directly antithetical to the Upanishads”.[115][note 28]

Survival of Vedic ritual[edit]

Vedism as the religious tradition of Hinduism of a priestly elite was marginalised by other traditions such as Jainism and Buddhism in the later Iron Age, but in the Middle Ages would rise to renewed prestige with the Mimamsa school, which as well as all other astika traditions of Hinduism, considered them authorless (apaurusheyatva) and eternal. A last surviving elements of the Historical Vedic religion or Vedism is Śrauta tradition, following many major elements of Vedic religion and is prominent in Southern India, with communities in Tamil NaduKeralaKarnatakaAndhra Pradesh, but also in some pockets of Uttar PradeshMaharashtra and other states; the best known of these groups are the Nambudiri of Kerala, whose traditions were notably documented by Frits Staal.[117][118][119]

Mauryan empire[edit]

The Mauryan period saw an early flowering of classical Sanskrit Sutra and Shastra literature and the scholarly exposition of the “circum-Vedic” fields of the Vedanga. However, during this time Buddhism was patronised by Ashoka, who ruled large parts of India, and Buddhism was also the mainstream religion until the Gupta empire period.


Since Vedic times, “people from many strata of society throughout the subcontinent tended to adapt their religious and social life to Brahmanic norms”, a process sometimes called Sanskritization.[120] It is reflected in the tendency to identify local deities with the gods of the Sanskrit texts.[120]

Classical Hinduism (c. 200 BCE-1200 CE)[edit]

Pre-classical Hinduism (c. 200 BCE-320 CE)[edit]

Hindu synthesis[edit]

Between 500[12]-200[36] BCE and c. 300 CE developed the “Hindu synthesis”,[12][36] which incorporated Sramanic and Buddhist influences[36][38] and the emerging bhakti tradition into the Brahmanical fold via the smriti literature.[39][36] This synthesis emerged under the pressure of the success of Buddhism and Jainism.[40]
According to Embree, several other religious traditions had existed side by side with the Vedic religion. These indigenous religions “eventually found a place under the broad mantle of the Vedic religion”.[121] When Brahmanism was declining[note 29] and had to compete with Buddhism and Jainism,[note 30] the popular religions had the opportunity to assert themselves.[121] According to Embree,

[T]he Brahmanists themselves seem to have encouraged this development to some extent as a means of meeting the challenge of the heterodox movements. At the same time, among the indigenous religions, a common allegiance to the authority of the Veda provided a thin, but nonetheless significant, thread of unity amid their variety of gods and religious practices.[121]


According to Larson, the Brahmins responded with assimilation and consolidation. This is reflected in the smriti literature which took shape in this period.[122] The smriti texts of the period between 200 BCE-100 CE proclaim the authority of the Vedas, and acceptance of the Vedas became a central criterium for defining Hinduism over and against the heterodoxies, which rejected the Vedas.[123] Most of the basic ideas and practices of classical Hinduism derive from the new smriti literature.[note 31]
Of the six Hindu darsanas, the Mimamsa and the Vedanta “are rooted primarily in the Vedic sruti tradition and are sometimes called smarta schools in the sense that they develop smarta orthodox current of thoughts that are based, like smriti, directly on sruti.[124] According to Hiltebeitel, “the consolidation of Hinduism takes place under the sign of bhakti“.[124]It is the Bhagavadgita that seals this achievement.[124] The result is an “universal achievement” that may be called smarta.[124] It views Shiva and Vishnu as “complementary in their functions but ontologically identical”.[124]
The major Sanskrit epics, Ramayana and Mahabharata, which belong to the smriti, were compiled over a protracted period during the late centuries BCE and the early centuries CE.[web 5] They contain mythological stories about the rulers and wars of ancient India, and are interspersed with religious and philosophical treatises. The later Puranas recount tales about devas and devis, their interactions with humans and their battles against rakshasa. The Bhagavad Gita “seals the achievement”[125] of the “consolidation of Hinduism”,[125] integrating Brahmanic and sramanic ideas with theistic devotion.[125][126][127][web 6]

Schools of Hindu philosophy[edit]

In early centuries CE several schools of Hindu philosophy were formally codified, including SamkhyaYogaNyayaVaisheshikaPurva-Mimamsa and Vedanta.[128]

Sangam literature[edit]

The Sangam literature (300 BCE – 300 CE) is a mostly secular body of classical literature in the Tamil language. Nonetheless there are some works, significantly Pattupathu and Paripaatal, wherein the personal devotion to god was written in form of devotional poems. VishnuShiva and Murugan were mentioned gods. These works are therefore the earliest evidences of monotheistic Bhakti traditions, preceding the large bhakti movement, which was given great attention in later times.

“Golden Age” (Gupta and Pallava period) (c. 320-650 CE)[edit]

During this period, power was centralised, along with a growth of near distance trade, standardization of legal procedures, and general spread of literacy.[129] Mahayana Buddhism flourished, but orthodox Brahmana culture began to be rejuvenated by the patronage of the Gupta Dynasty,[130] who were Vaishnavas.[131] The position of the Brahmans was reinforced,[129] the first Hindu temples dedicated to the gods of the Hindu deities, emerged during the late Gupta age.[129][note 32] During the Gupta reign the first Puranas were written,[41][note 8] which were used to disseminate “mainstream religious ideology amongst pre-literate and tribal groups undergoing acculturation.”[41] The Guptas patronised the newly emerging Puranic religion, seeking legitimacy for their dynasty.[131] The resulting Puranic Hinduism, differed markedly from the earlier Brahmanism of the Dharmasastras and the smritis.[41]
According to P.S. Sharma “the Gupta and Harsha periods form really, from the strictly intellectual standpoint, the most brilliant epocha in the development of Indian philosophy”, as Hindu and Buddhist philosophies flourished side by side.[132] Charvaka, the atheistic materialist school, came to the fore in North India before the 8th century CE.[133]

Gupta and Pallava Empires[edit]

The Gupta period (4th to 6th centuries) saw a flowering of scholarship, the emergence of the classical schools of Hindu philosophy, and of classical Sanskrit literature in general on topics ranging from medicine, veterinary science, mathematics, to astrology and astronomy and astrophysics. The famous Aryabhata and Varahamihira belong to this age. The Gupta established a strong central government which also allowed a degree of local control. Gupta society was ordered in accordance with Hindu beliefs. This included a strict caste system, or class system. The peace and prosperity created under Gupta leadership enabled the pursuit of scientific and artistic endeavors.
The Pallavas (4th to 9th centuries) were, alongside the Guptas of the North, patronisers of Sanskrit in the South of the Indian subcontinent. The Pallava reign saw the first Sanskrit inscriptions in a script called Grantha. Early Pallavas had different connexions to Southeast Asian countries. The Pallavas used Dravidian architecture to build some very important Hindu temples and academies in MamallapuramKanchipuram and other places; their rule saw the rise of great poets, who are as famous as Kalidasa.
The practice of dedicating temples to different deities came into vogue followed by fine artistic temple architecture and sculpture (see Vastu Shastra).


This period saw the emergence of the Bhakti movement. The Bhakti movement was a rapid growth of bhakti beginning in Tamil Nadu in Southern India with the Saiva Nayanars (4th to 10th centuries CE)[134] and the Vaisnava Alvars (3rd to 9th centuries CE) who spread bhakti poetry and devotion throughout India by the 12th to 18th centuries CE.[135][134]

Expansion in South-East Asia[edit]

Expansion of Hinduism in Southeast Asia.

Hindu influences reached the Indonesian Archipelago as early as first century.[136] At this time, India started to strongly influence Southeast Asian countries. Trade routes linked India with southern Burma, central and southern Siam, lower Cambodia and southern Vietnam and numerous urbanised coastal settlements were established there.
For more than a thousand years, Indian Hindu/Buddhist influence was therefore the major factor that brought a certain level of cultural unity to the various countries of the region. The Pali and Sanskrit languages and the Indian script, together with Theravada and Mahayana BuddhismBrahmanism and Hinduism, were transmitted from direct contact as well as through sacred texts and Indian literature, such as the Ramayana and the Mahabharata epics.
From the 5th to the 13th century, South-East Asia had very powerful Indian colonial empires and became extremely active in Hindu and Buddhist architectural and artistic creation. The Sri Vijaya Empire to the south and the Khmer Empire to the north competed for influence.
Langkasuka (-langkha Sanskrit for “resplendent land” –sukkha of “bliss”) was an ancient Hindu kingdom located in the Malay Peninsula. The kingdom, along with Old Kedah settlement, are probably the earliest territorial footholds founded on the Malay Peninsula. According to tradition, the founding of the kingdom happened in the 2nd century; Malay legends claim that Langkasuka was founded at Kedah, and later moved to Pattani.
From the 5th-15th centuries Sri Vijayan empire, a maritime empire centred on the island of Sumatra in Indonesia, had adopted Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism under a line of rulers named the Sailendras. The Empire of Sri Vijaya declined due to conflicts with the Chola rulers of India. The Majapahit Empire succeeded the Singhasari empire. It was one of the last and greatest Hindu empires in Maritime Southeast Asia.
Funan was a pre-Angkor Cambodian kingdom, located around the Mekong delta, probably established by Mon-Khmer settlers speaking an Austroasiatic language. According to reports by two Chinese envoys, K’ang T’ai and Chu Ying, the state was established by an Indian Brahmin named Kaundinya, who in the 1st century CE was given instruction in a dream to take a magic bow from a temple and defeat a Khmer queen, Soma. Soma, the daughter of the king of the Nagas, married Kaundinya and their lineage became the royal dynasty of Funan. The myth had the advantage of providing the legitimacy of both an Indian Brahmin and the divinity of the cobras, who at that time were held in religious regard by the inhabitants of the region.
The kingdom of Champa (or Lin-yi in Chinese records) controlled what is now south and central Vietnam from approximately 192 through 1697. The dominant religion of the Cham people was Hinduism and the culture was heavily influenced by India.
Later, from the 9th to the 13th century, the Mahayana Buddhist and Hindu Khmer Empire dominated much of the South-East Asian peninsula. Under the Khmer, more than 900 temples were built in Cambodia and in neighboring Thailand. Angkor was at the centre of this development, with a temple complex and urban organisation able to support around one million urban dwellers. The largest temple complex of the world, Angkor Wat, stands here; built by the king Vishnuvardhan.

Late-Classical Hinduism – Puranic Hinduism (c. 650-1200 CE)[edit]

See also Late-Classical Age.

After the end of the Gupta Empire and the collapse of the Harsha Empire, power became decentralised in India. Several larger kingdoms emerged, with “countless vasal states”.[137][note 33] The kingdoms were ruled via a feudal system. Smaller kingdoms were dependent on the protection of the larger kingdoms. “The great king was remote, was exalted and deified”,[137] as reflected in the Tantric Mandala, which could also depict the king as the centre of the mandala.[138]
The disintegration of central power also lead to regionalisation of religiosity, and religious rivalry.[139][note 34] Local cults and languages were enhanced, and the influence of “Brahmanic ritualistic Hinduism”[139] was diminished.[139] Rural and devotional movements arose, along with ShaivismVaisnavismBhakti and Tantra,[139] though “sectarian groupings were only at the beginning of their development”.[139] Religious movements had to compete for recognition by the local lords.[139] Buddhism lost its position after the 8th century, and began to disappear in India.[139] This was reflected in the change of puja-ceremonies at the courts in the 8th century, where Hindu gods replaced the Buddha as the “supreme, imperial deity”.[note 35]

Puranic Hinduism[edit]

The Brahmanism of the Dharmashastras and the smritis underwent a radical transformation at the hands of the Purana composers, resulting in the rise of Puranic Hinduism,[41]“which like a colossus striding across the religious firmanent soon came to overshadow all existing religions”.[140] Puranic Hinduism was a “multiplex belief-system which grew and expanded as it absorbed and synthesised polaristic ideas and cultic traditions”[140] It was distinguished from its Vedic Smarta roots by its popular base, its theological and sectarioan pluralism, its Tantric veneer, and the central place of bhakti.[140][note 9]
The early mediaeval Puranas were composed to disseminate religious mainstream ideology among the pre-literate tribal societies undergoing acculturation.[41] With the breakdown of the Gupta empire, gifts of virgin waste-land were heaped on brahmanas,[46][141] to ensure provitable agrarical exploitation of land owned by the kings,[46] but also to provide status to the new ruling classes.[46] Brahmanas spread further over India, interacting with local clans with different religions and ideologies.[46] The Brahmanas used the Puranas to incorporate those clans into the agrarical society and its accompanying religion and ideology.[46] According to Flood, “[t]he Brahmans who followed the puranic religion became known as smarta, those whose worship was based on the smriti, or pauranika, those based on the Puranas.”[142] Local chiefs and peasants were absorbed into the varna, which was used to keep “control over the new kshatriyas and shudras.”[143] The Brahmanic group was enlarged by incorporating local subgroups, such as local priests.[46] This also lead to a stratification within the Brahmins, with some Brahmins having a lower status than other Brahmins.[46] The use of caste worked better with the new Puranic Hinduism than with the sramanic sects.[143] The Puranic texts provided extensive genealogies which gave status to the new kshatriyas.[143] Buddhist myths pictured government as a contract between an elected ruler and the people.[143] And the Buddhist chakkavatti[note 36] “was a distinct concept from the models of conquest held up to the kshatriyas and the Rajputs.”[143]
Many local religions and traditions were assimilated into puranic Hinduism. Vishnu and Shiva emerged as the main deities, together with Sakti/Deva.[144] Vishnu subsumed the cults of NarayanaJagannathsVenkateswara “and many others”.[144] Nath:

[S]ome incarnations of Vishnu such as Matsya, Kurma, Varaha and perhaps even Nrsimha helped to incorporate certain popular totem symbols and creation myths, specially those related to wild boar, which commonly permeate preliterate mythology, others such as Krsna and Balarama became instrumental in assimilating local cults and myths centering around two popular pastoral and agricultural gods.[145]

The transformation of Brahmanism into Pauranic Hinduism in post-Gupta India was due to a process of acculturation. The Puranas helped establish a religious mainstream among the pre-literate tribal societies undergoing acculturation. The tenets of Brahmanism and of the Dharmashastras underwent a radical transformation at the hands of the Purana composers, resulting in the rise of a mainstream “Hinduism” that overshadowed all earlier traditions.[46]

Bhakti movement[edit]

Rama and Krishna became the focus of a strong bhakti tradition, which found expression particularly in the Bhagavata Purana. The Krishna tradition subsumed numerous Naga, yaksa and hill and tree based cults.[146] Siva absorbed local cults by the suffixing of Isa or Isvara to the name of the local deity, for example Bhutesvara, Hatakesvara, Chandesvara.[144] In 8th-century royal circles, the Buddha started to be replaced by Hindu gods in pujas.[note 37] This also was the same period of time the Buddha was made into an avatar of Vishnu.[148]
The first documented bhakti movement was founded by Karaikkal-ammaiyar. She wrote poems in Tamil about her love for Shiva and probably lived around the 6th century CE. The twelve Alvars who were Vaishnavite devotees and the sixty-three Nayanars who were Shaivite devotees nurtured the incipient bhakti movement in Tamil Nadu.
During the 12th century CE in Karnataka, the Bhakti movement took the form of the Virashaiva movement. It was inspired by Basavanna, a Hindu reformer who created the sect of Lingayats or Shiva bhaktas. During this time, a unique and native form of Kannada literature-poetry called Vachanas was born.

Advaita Vedanta[edit]

Shankara (8th century CE) is regarded as the greatest exponent of Advaita Vedanta.[citation needed] Shankara himself, and his grand-teacher Gaudapada, were influenced by Buddhism.[149][150][151][152] Gaudapda took over the Buddhist doctrines that ultimate reality is pure consciousness (vijñapti-mātra)[153] and “that the nature of the world is the four-cornered negation”.[153] Gaudapada “wove [both doctrines] into a philosophy of the Mandukya Upanishad, which was further developed by Shankara”.[150] Gaudapada also took over the Buddhist concept of “ajāta” from Nagarjuna’s Madhyamaka philosophy.[151][152] Shankara succeeded in reading Gaudapada’s mayavada[154][note 38] into Badarayana’s Brahma Sutras, “and give it a locus classicus“,[154] against the realistic strain of the Brahma Sutras.[154]
Shankara is the founder of the Dashanami Sampradaya of Hindu monasticism and Shanmata tradition of worship. Shankara is also regarded as the greatest teacher[155] and reformer of the Smartha Tradition.[156][155] According to Hinduism-guide.com:

Not all Brahmins specialized in this Smriti tradition. Some were influenced by Buddhism, Jainism or Charvaka tradition and philosophy. This did not mean that all these people rejected the authority of Vedas, but only that their tradition of worship and philosophy was based not on smriti texts. In time, Shankaracharya brought all the Vedic communities together. He tried to remove the non-smriti aspects that had crept into the Hindu communities. He also endeavoured to unite them by arguing that any of the different Hindu gods could be worshipped, according to the prescriptions given in the smriti texts. He established that worship of various deities are compatible with Vedas and is not contradictory, since all are different manifestations of one nirguna Brahman. Shankaracharya was instrumental in reviving interest in the smritis.[web 11]

In modern times, due to the influence of western Orientalism and Perennialism on Indian Neo-Vedanta and Hindu nationalism,[116] Advaita Vedanta has acquired a broad acceptance in Indian culture and beyond as the paradigmatic example of Hindu spirituality.[116]

Contact with Persia and Mesopotamia[edit]

Hindu and also Buddhist religious and secular learning had first reached Persia in an organised manner in the 6th century, when the Sassanid Emperor Khosrau I (531–579) deputed Borzuya the physician as his envoy, to invite Indian and Chinese scholars to the Academy of Gundishapur. Burzoe had translated the Sanskrit Panchatantra. His Pahlavi version was translated into Arabic by Ibn al-Moqaffa under the title of Kalila and Dimna or The Fables of Bidpai.[157]
Under the Abbasid caliphate, Baghdad had replaced Gundishapur as the most important centre of learning in the then vast Islamic Empire, wherein the traditions as well as scholars of the latter flourished. Hindu scholars were invited to the conferences on sciences and mathematics held in Baghdad.[158]

Medieval and Early Modern Periods (c. 1200-1850 CE)[edit]

Muslim rule[edit]

Babur visits a Hindu temple.

Though Islam came to Indian subcontinent in the early 7th century with the advent of Arab traders, it started impacting Indian religions after the 10th century, and particularly after the 12th century with the establishment and then expansion of Islamic rule.[159][160] Will Durant calls the Muslim conquest of India “probably the bloodiest story in history”.[161] During this period, Buddhism declined rapidly while Hinduism faced military-led and Sultanates-sponsored religious violence.[161][162] There was a widespread practice of raids, seizure and enslavement of families of Hindus, who were then sold in Sultanate cities or exported to Central Asia.[163][164] Some texts suggest a number of Hindus were forcibly converted to Islam.[165][166] Starting with 13th century, for a period of some 500 years, very few texts, from the numerous written by Muslim court historians, mention any “voluntary conversions of Hindus to Islam”, suggesting its insignificance and perhaps rarity of such conversions.[166] Typically enslaved Hindus converted to Islam to gain their freedom.[167] There were occasional exceptions to religious violence against Hinduism. Akbar, for example, recognized Hinduism, banned enslavement of the families of Hindu war captives, protected Hindu temples, and abolished discriminatory Jizya (head taxes) against Hindus.[163][168] However, many Muslim rulers of Delhi Sultanate and Mughal Empire, before and after Akbar, from 12th century to 18th century, destroyed Hindu temples[web 12][169][web 13][note 39]and persecuted non-Muslims.

Unifying Hinduism[edit]

Hinduism underwent profound changes, aided in part by teachers such as RamanujaMadhva, and Chaitanya.[159] Followers of the Bhakti movement moved away from the abstract concept of Brahman, which the philosopher Adi Shankara consolidated a few centuries before, with emotional, passionate devotion towards the more accessible Avatars, especially Krishna and Rama.[170] According to Nicholson, already between the 12th and the 16th century, “certain thinkers began to treat as a single whole the diverse philosophical teachings of the Upanishads, epics, Puranas, and the schools known retrospectively as the “six systems” (saddarsana) of mainstream Hindu philosophy.”[171][note 40] Michaels notes that a historicization emerged which preceded later nationalism, articulating ideas which glorified Hinduism and the past.[172]

Early Modern period (c. 1500-1850 CE)[edit]

The fall of Vijayanagar Empire to Muslim rulers had marked the end of Hindu imperial assertions in the Deccan. But, taking advantage of an over-stretched Mughal Empire (1526–1857), Hinduism once again rose to political prestige, under the Maratha Empire, from 1674 to 1818.

Mughal Empire[edit]

The Mughal Empire

After the conquest of Persia by the Mongol Empire, a regional Turko-Persio-Mongol dynasty formed. Just as eastern Mongol dynasties inter-married with locals and adopted the local religion of Buddhism and the Chinese culture, this group adopted the local religion of Islamand the Persian culture; their descendants ruled in India as Mughals.
The official State religion of the Mughal Empire was Islam, with the preference to the jurisprudence of the Hanafi Madhhab (Mazhab). Hinduism remained under strain during Babur and Humanyun’s reigns. Sher Shah Suri, the Afghan ruler of North India was comparatively non-repressive. Hinduism came to fore during the three-year rule of Hindu king ‘Hemu‘ during 1553-56 when he had defeated Akbar at Agra and Delhi and had taken up the reign from Delhi as a Hindu ‘Vikramaditya’ king after his ‘Rajyabhishake’ or coronation at ‘Purana Quila‘ in Delhi. However, during Mughal history, at times, subjects had freedom to practise any religion of their choice, though non-Muslim able-bodied adult males with income were obliged to pay the Jizya, which signified their status as Dhimmis.

Photograph of the Surya Temple, The most impressive and grandest ruins in Kashmir, at Marttand-Hardy Cole’s Archaeological Survey of India Report ‘Illustrations of Ancient Buildings in Kashmir.’ (1869)

Akbar, the Mughal emperor Humayun‘s son and heir from his Sindhi queen Hameeda Banu Begum, had a broad vision of Indian and Islamic traditions. One of Emperor Akbar‘s most unusual ideas regarding religion was Din-i-Ilahi (Faith of God), which was an eclectic mix of IslamZoroastrianism, Hinduism, Jainism and Christianity. It was proclaimed the state religion until his death. These actions however met with stiff opposition from the Muslim clergy, especially the SufiShaykh Alf Sani Ahmad Sirhindi. Akbar’s abolition of poll-tax on non-Muslims, acceptance of ideas from other religious philosophies, toleration of public worship by all religions and his interest in other faiths showed an attitude of considerable religious tolerance, which, in the minds of his orthodox Muslim opponents, were tantamount to apostasy.
Akbar’s son, Jahangir, half Rajput, was also a religious moderate, his mother being Hindu. The influence of his two Hindu queens (the Maharani Maanbai and Maharani Jagat) kept religious moderation as a centre-piece of state policy which was extended under his son, Emperor Shah Jahan, who was by blood 75% Rajput and less than 25% Moghul.
Religious orthodoxy would only play an important role during the reign of Shah Jahan’s son and successor, Aurangzeb, a devout Sunni Muslim. Aurangzeb was comparatively less tolerant of other faiths than his predecessors had been, and his reign saw an increase in the number and importance of Islamic institutions and scholars. He led many military campaigns against the remaining non-Muslim powers of the Indian subcontinent – the Sikh states of the Punjab, the last independent Hindu Rajputs and the Maratha rebels – as also against the Shia Muslim kingdoms of the Deccan. He also virtually stamped out, from his empire, open proselytisation of Hindus and Muslims by foreign Christian Missionaries, who remained successfully active, however, in the adjoining regions: the present day KeralaTamil Nadu and Goa.

Maratha Empire[edit]

The last Hindu empire of India – The Maratha Empire in 1760.

The Hindu Marathas long had lived in the Desh region around Satara, in the western portion of the Deccan plateau, where the plateau meets the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats mountains. They had resisted incursions into the region by the Muslim Mughal rulers of northern India. Under their ambitious leader Shivaji, the Maratha freed themselves from the Muslim sultans of Bijapur to the southeast and, becoming much more aggressive, began to frequently raid Mughal territory, eventually sacking the wealthy Mughal port of Surat in 1664. After substantial territorial gains, Shivaji was proclaimed ‘Chhatrapati’ (Emperor) in 1674; the Marathas had spread and conquered much of central India by Shivaji’s death in 1680. Subsequently, under the able leadership of Brahmin prime ministers (Peshwas), the Maratha Empire reached its zenith; Pune, the seat of Peshwas, flowered as a centre of Hindu learning and traditions. The empire at its peak stretched from Tamil Nadu[173] in the south, to Peshawar (modern-day Khyber PakhtunkhwaPakistan[174] [note 41]) in the north, and Bengaland Andaman Islands in the east.[176] In 1761, the Maratha army lost the Third Battle of Panipat to Ahmad Shah Abdali of the Afghan Durrani Empire which halted their imperial expansion into Afghanistan. Ten years after Panipat, the young Peshwa Madhavrao I‘s Maratha Resurrection reinstated Maratha authority over North India.
In 1761, the Maratha army lost the Third Battle of Panipat to Ahmad Shah Abdali of the Afghan Durrani Empire which halted their imperial expansion into Afghanistan. Ten years after Panipat, the Peshwa Madhavrao I‘s Maratha Resurrection reinstated Maratha authority over North India. In a bid to effectively manage the large empire, he gave semi-autonomy to the strongest of the knights, which created a confederacy of Maratha states. They became known as the Gaekwads of Baroda, the Holkars of Indore and Malwa, the Scindias of Gwalior and Ujjain, the Bhonsales of the Nagpur and the Puars of Dhar & Dewas. In 1775, the East India Company intervened in a Peshwa family succession struggle in Pune, which became the First Anglo-Maratha War. The Marathas remained the preeminent power in India until their defeat in the Second Anglo-Maratha War which left the East India Company in control of most of India.

Early colonialism[edit]

Portuguese missionaries had reached the Malabar Coast in the late 15th century, made contact with the St Thomas Christians in Kerala and sought to introduce the Latin Riteamong them. Since the priests for St Thomas Christians were served by the Eastern Christian Churches, they were following Eastern Christian practices at that time. Throughout this period, foreign missionaries also made many new converts to Christianity. This led to the formation of the Latin Catholics in Kerala.
The Goa Inquisition was the office of the Christian Inquisition acting in the Indian city of Goa and the rest of the Portuguese empire in Asia. St. Francis Xavier, in a 1545 letter to John III, requested for an Inquisition to be installed in Goa. It was installed eight years after the death of Francis Xavier in 1552. Established in 1560 and operating until 1774, this highly controversial institution was aimed primarily at Hindus and wayward new converts.
In the century from 1760 to 1860, India was once more divided into numerous petty or unstable kingdoms, gradually coming under the paramountcy the British Empire: the “lesser Mughals”, the Kingdom of MysoreHyderabad StateMaratha ConfederacyRajput KingdomsPalaiyakkarar states, North-Eastern states such as Kingdom of Manipur, Himalayan states, etc. From 1799 to 1849 the only major stable kingdom in India was the Sikh Empire, although it had a syncretic character with a large number of Hindu and Muslim subjects living in peace. It too became unstable after the death of Maharaja Ranjit Singh. The entire subcontinent fell under British rule (partly indirectly, via princely states) following the Indian Rebellion of 1857.

Modern Hinduism (after c. 1850 CE)[edit]

With the onset of the British Raj, the colonization of India by the British, there also started a Hindu renaissance in the 19th century, which profoundly changed the understanding of Hinduism in both India and the west.[177] Indology as an academic discipline of studying Indian culture from a European perspective was established in the 19th century, led by scholars such as Max Müller and John Woodroffe. They brought VedicPuranic and Tantric literature and philosophy to Europe and the United States. Western orientalist searched for the “essence” of the Indian religions, discerning this in the Vedas,[178] and meanwhile creating the notion of “Hinduism” as a unified body of religious praxis[116] and the popular picture of ‘mystical India’.[116][177] This idea of a Vedic essence was taken over by Hindu reform movements as the Brahmo Samaj, which was supported for a while by the Unitarian Church,[179] together with the ideas of Universalism and Perennialism, the idea that all religions share a common mystic ground.[180] This “Hindu modernism”, with proponents like VivekanandaAurobindo and Radhakrishnan, became central in the popular understanding of Hinduism.[181][182][183][184][116]

Hindu revivalism[edit]

1909 Prevailing Religions, Map of British Indian Empire, 1909, showing the prevailing majority religions of the population for different districts.

During the 19th century, Hinduism developed a large number of new religious movements, partly inspired by the European Romanticismnationalismscientific racism and esotericism (Theosophy) popular at the time (while conversely and contemporaneously, India had a similar effect on European culture with Orientalism, “Hindoo style” architecture, reception of Buddhism in the West and similar). According to Paul Hacker, “the ethcial values of Neo-Hinduism stem from Western philosophy and Christianity, although they are expressed in Hindu terms.”[185]
These reform movements are summarised under Hindu revivalism and continue into the present.

Reception in the West[edit]

An important development during the British colonial period was the influence Hindu traditions began to form on Western thought and new religious movements. An early champion of Indian-inspired thought in the West was Arthur Schopenhauer who in the 1850s advocated ethics based on an “Aryan-Vedic theme of spiritual self-conquest”, as opposed to the ignorant drive toward earthly utopianism of the superficially this-worldly “Jewish” spirit.[186] Helena Blavatsky moved to India in 1879, and her Theosophical Society, founded in New York in 1875, evolved into a peculiar mixture of Western occultism and Hindu mysticism over the last years of her life.
The sojourn of Vivekananda to the World Parliament of Religions in Chicago in 1893 had a lasting effect. Vivekananda founded the Ramakrishna Mission, a Hindu missionary organisation still active today.
In the early 20th century, Western occultists influenced by Hinduism include Maximiani Portaz – an advocate of “Aryan Paganism” – who styled herself Savitri Devi and Jakob Wilhelm Hauer, founder of the German Faith Movement. It was in this period, and until the 1920s, that the swastika became a ubiquitous symbol of good luck in the West before its association with the Nazi Party became dominant in the 1930s.
Hinduism-inspired elements in Theosophy were also inherited by the spin-off movements of Ariosophy and Anthroposophy and ultimately contributed to the renewed New Ageboom of the 1960s to 1980s, the term New Age itself deriving from Blavatsky’s 1888 The Secret Doctrine.
Influential 20th-century Hindus were Ramana MaharshiB.K.S. IyengarParamahansa YoganandaPrabhupada (founder of ISKCON), Sri ChinmoySwami Rama and others who translated, reformulated and presented Hinduism’s foundational texts for contemporary audiences in new iterations, raising the profiles of Yoga and Vedanta in the West and attracting followers and attention in India and abroad.

Contemporary Hinduism[edit]

As of 2007, of an estimated 944 million Hindus, 98.5% live in South Asia. Of the remaining 1.5% or 14 million, 6 million live in Southeast Asia (mostly Indonesia), 2 million in Europe, 1.8 million in North America, 1.2 million in Southern Africa.

South Asia[edit]

Modern Hinduism is the reflection of continuity and progressive changes that occurred in various traditions and institutions of Hinduism during the 19th and 20th centuries. Its main divisions are into Vaishnavism (largely influenced by Bhakti), ShaivismShaktism and Smartism (Advaita Vedanta).
Besides these traditional denominations, movements of Hindu revivalism look to founders such as Swami VivekanandaSwami Dayananda (Arya Samaj), Rabindranath TagoreRamana MaharshiAurobindoShriram Sharma AcharyaSwami SivanandaSwami Rama TirthaNarayana GuruParamhansa YoganandaSwami ChinmayanandaShrii Shrii AnandamurtiPandurang Shastri Athavale (Swadhyay Movement) and others.
The Hindutva movement advocating Hindu nationalism originated in the 1920s and has remained a strong political force in India. The major party of the religious right, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), since its foundation in 1980 has won several elections, and after a defeat in 2004 remained the leading force of opposition against the coalition government of the Congress Party. The last national general election, held in early 2014, saw a dramatic victory of BJP; it gained an absolute majority and formed the government, with Narendra Modi as Prime Minister.

Southeast Asia[edit]

The resurgence of Hinduism in Indonesia is occurring in all parts of the country. In the early seventies, the Toraja people of Sulawesi were the first to be identified under the umbrella of ‘Hinduism’, followed by the Karo Batak of Sumatra in 1977 and the Ngaju Dayak of Kalimantan in 1980.
The growth of Hinduism has been driven also by the famous Javanese prophesies of Sabdapalon and Jayabaya. Many recent converts to Hinduism had been members of the families of Sukarno‘s PNI, and now support Megawati Sukarnoputri. This return to the ‘religion of Majapahit‘ (Hinduism) is a matter of nationalist pride.
The new Hindu communities in Java tend to be concentrated around recently built temples (pura) or around archaeological temple sites (candi) which are being reclaimed as places of Hindu worship. An important new Hindu temple in eastern Java is Pura Mandaragiri Sumeru Agung, located on the slope of Mt. Semeru, Java’s highest mountain. Mass conversions have also occurred in the region around Pura Agung Blambangan, another new temple, built on a site with minor archaeological remnants attributed to the kingdom of Blambangan, the last Hindu polity on Java, and Pura Loka Moksa Jayabaya (in the village of Menang near Kediri).

Neo-Hindu movements in the west[edit]

In modern times Smarta-views have been highly influential in both the Indian[web 14] and western[web 15] understanding of Hinduism via Neo-Vedanta. Vivekananda was an advocate of Smarta-views,[web 15] and Radhakrishnan was himself a Smarta-Brahman.[187][188] According to iskcon.org,

Many Hindus may not strictly identify themselves as Smartas but, by adhering to Advaita Vedanta as a foundation for non-sectarianism, are indirect followers.[web 14]

Influential in spreading Hinduism to a western audience were Swami VivekanandaA.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada (Hare Krishna movement), Sri AurobindoMeher BabaMaharishi Mahesh Yogi (Transcendental Meditation), Jiddu KrishnamurtiSathya Sai BabaMother Meera, among others.


In the 20th century, Hinduism also gained prominence as a political force and a source for national identity in India. With origins traced back to the establishment of the Hindu Mahasabha in the 1910s, the movement grew with the formulation and development of the Hindutva ideology in the following decades; the establishment of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in 1925; and the entry, and later success, of RSS offshoots Jana Sangha and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in electoral politics in post-independence India.[189] Hindu religiosity plays an important role in the nationalist movement.[190][note 42][note 43]

See also[edit]


  1. Jump up^ See:
    • “Oldest religion”:
      • Fowler: “probably the oldest religion in the world”[2]
      • Gellman & Hartman: “Hinduism, the world’s oldest religion”[3]
      • Stevens: “Hinduism, the oldest religion in the world”,[4]
    • The “oldest living religion[5]
    • The “oldest living major religion” in the world.[6][7]
      • Laderman: “world’s oldest living civilisation and religion”[8]
      • Turner: “It is also recognized as the oldest major religion in the world”[9]

    Smart, on the other hand, calls it also one of the youngest religions: “Hinduism could be seen to be much more recent, though with various ancient roots: in a sense it was formed in the late 19th Century and early 20th Century.”[10] See also:

  2. Jump up^ Among its roots are the Vedic religion[14] of the late Vedic period and its emphasis on the status of Brahmans,[17] but also the religions of the Indus Valley Civilisation,[15][18][19][20] the Sramana[21] or renouncer traditions[14] of north-east India,[21] and “popular or local traditions“.[14]
  3. Jump up^ There is no exact dating possible for the beginning of the Vedic period. Witzel mentions a range between 1900 and 1400 BCE.[23] Flood mentions 1500 BCE.[24]
  4. Jump up^ Lockard (2007, p. 50): “The encounters that resulted from Aryan migration brought together several very different peoples and cultures, reconfiguring Indian society. Over many centuries a fusion of Aryan and Dravidian occurred, a complex process that historians have labeled the Indo-Aryan synthesis.” Lockard: “Hinduism can be seen historically as a synthesis of Aryan beliefs with Harappan and other Dravidian traditions that developed over many centuries.”
  5. Jump up^ Hiltebeitel (2007, p. 12): “A period of consolidation, sometimes identified as one of “Hindu synthesis,” Brahmanic synthesis,” or “orthodox synthesis,” takes place between the time of the late Vedic Upanishads (c. 500 BCE) and the period of Gupta imperial ascendency” (c. 320-467 CE).”
  6. Jump up^ See also:
  7. Jump up to:a b c See:
    • White (2006, p. 28): “[T]he religion of the Vedas was already a composite of the indo-Aryan and Harappan cultures and civilizations.”
    • Gombrich (1996, pp. 35–36): “It is important to bear in mind that the Indo-Aryans did not enter an unhabitated land. For nearly two millennia they and their culture gradually penetrated India, moving east and south from their original seat in the Punjab. They mixed with people who spoke Munda or Dravidian languages, who have left no traces of their culture beyond some archaeological remains; we know as little about them as we would about the Indo-Aryans if they had left no texts. In fact we cannot even be sure whether some of the archaeological finds belong to Indo-Aryans, autochthonous populations, or a mixture.

      It is to be assumed – though this is not fashionable in Indian historiography – that the clash of cultures between Indo-Aryans and autochtones was responsible for many of the changes in Indo-Aryan society. We can also assume that many – perhaps most – of the indigenous population came to be assimilated into Indo-Aryan culture.

  8. Jump up to:a b The date of the production of the written texts does not define the date of origin of the Puranas (Johnson 2009, p. 247). They may have existed in some oral form before being written down (Johnson 2009, p. 247).
  9. Jump up to:a b Michaels (2004, p. 38): “The legacy of the Vedic religion in Hinduism is generally overestimated. The influence of the mythology is indeed great, but the religious terminology changed considerably: all the key terms of Hinduism either do not exist in Vedic or have a completely different meaning. The religion of the Veda does not know the ethicised migration of the soul with retribution for acts (karma), the cyclical destruction of the world, or the idea of salvation during one’s lifetime (jivanmukti; moksa; nirvana); the idea of the world as illusion (maya) must have gone against the grain of ancient India, and an omnipotent creator god emerges only in the late hymns of the rgveda. Nor did the Vedic religion know a caste system, the burning of widows, the ban on remarriage, images of gods and temples, Puja worship, Yoga, pilgrimages, vegetarianism, the holiness of cows, the doctrine of stages of life (asrama), or knew them only at their inception. Thus, it is justified to see a turning point between the Vedic religion and Hindu religions.” See also Halbfass 1991, pp. 1–2
  10. Jump up^ University of Oslo: “During the period following Ashoka, until the end of the 7th century AD, the great gift ceremonies honoring the Buddha remained the central cult of Indian imperial kingdoms”.[web 1]
  11. Jump up^ Samuel (2010, p. 76): “Certainly, there is substantial textual evidence for the outward expansion of Vedic-Brahmanical culture.”

    Samuel (2010, p. 77): “[T]he Buddhist sutras describe what was in later periods a standard mechanism for the expansion of Vedic-Brahmanical culture: the settlement of Brahmins on land granted by local rulers.” See also Vijay Nath (2001).

    Samuel (2010, p. 199): “By the first and second centuries CE, the Dravidian-speaking regions of the south were also increasingly being incorporated into the general North and Central Indian cultural pattern, as were parts at least of Southeast Asia. The Pallava kingdom in South India was largely Brahmanical in orientation although it included a substantial Jain and Buddhist population, while Indic states were also beginning to develop in Southeast Asia.”

  12. Jump up^ Larson (1995, p. 81): “Also, the spread of the culture of North India to the South was accomplished in many instances by the spread of Buddhist and Jain institutions (monasteries, lay communities, and so forth). The Pallavas of Kanci appear to have been one of the main vehicles for the spread of specifically Indo-Brahmanical or Hindu institutions in the South, a process that was largely completed after the Gupta Age. As Basham has noted, “the contact of Aryan and Dravidian produced a vigorous cultural synthesis, which in turn had an immense influence on Indian civilization as a whole.”
  13. Jump up^ Flood (1996, p. 129): “The process of Sanskritization only began to significantly influence the south after the first two centuries CE and Tamil deities and forms of worship became adapted to northern Sanskrit forms.”
  14. Jump up^ Wendy Doniger: “If Sanskritization has been the main means of connecting the various local traditions throughout the subcontinent, the converse process, which has no convenient label, has been one of the means whereby Hinduism has changed and developed over the centuries. Many features of Hindu mythology and several popular gods—such as Ganesha, an elephant-headed god, and Hanuman, the monkey god—were incorporated into Hinduism and assimilated into the appropriate Vedic gods by this means. Similarly, the worship of many goddesses who are now regarded as the consorts of the great male Hindu gods, as well as the worship of individual unmarried goddesses, may have arisen from the worship of non-Vedic local goddesses. Thus, the history of Hinduism can be interpreted as the interplay between orthoprax custom and the practices of wider ranges of people and, complementarily, as the survival of features of local traditions that gained strength steadily until they were adapted by the Brahmans.”[web 2]

    Vijay Nath (2001, p. 31): “Visnu and Siva, on the other hand, as integral components of the Triad while continuing to be a subject of theological speculation, however, in their subsequent “avataras” began to absorb countless local cults and deities within their folds. The latter were either taken to represent the multiple facets of the same god or else were supposed to denote different forms and appellations by which the god came to be known and worshipped. Thus whereas Visnu came to subsume the cults of NarayanaJagannathaVenkateswara and many others, Siva became identified with countless local cults by the sheer suffixing of Isa or Isvarato the name of the local deity, e.g., Bhutesvara, Hatakesvara, Chandesvara.”

  15. Jump up^ Wendy Doniger: “The process, sometimes called “Sanskritization,” began in Vedic times and was probably the principal method by which the Hinduism of the Sanskrit texts spread through the subcontinent and into Southeast Asia. Sanskritization still continues in the form of the conversion of tribal groups, and it is reflected in the persistence of the tendency among some Hindus to identify rural and local deities with the gods of the Sanskrit texts.”[web 2]
  16. Jump up^ See also Tanvir Anjum, Temporal Divides: A Critical Review of the Major Schemes of Periodization in Indian History.
  17. Jump up^ Different periods are designated as “classical Hinduism”:
    • Smart (2003, p. 52) calls the period between 1000 BCE and 100 CE “pre-classical”. It is the formative period for the Upanishads and Brahmanism[subnote 4] Jainism and Buddhism. For Smart, the “classical period” lasts from 100 to 1000 CE, and coincides with the flowering of “classical Hinduism” and the flowering and deterioration of Mahayana-buddhism in India.
    • For Michaels (2004, pp. 36, 38), the period between 500 BCE and 200 BCE is a time of “Ascetic reformism”, whereas the period between 200 BCE and 1100 CE is the time of “classical Hinduism”, since there is “a turning point between the Vedic religion and Hindu religions”.
    • Muesse (2003, p. 14) discerns a longer period of change, namely between 800 BCE and 200 BCE, which he calls the “Classical Period”. According to Muesse, some of the fundamental concepts of Hinduism, namely karma, reincarnation and “personal enlightenment and transformation”, which did not exist in the Vedic religion, developed in this time.
    • Stein (2010, p. 107) The Indian History Congress, formally adopted 1206 CE as the date medieval India began.
  18. Jump up^ Doniger (2010, p. 66): “Much of what we now call Hinduism may have had roots in cultures that thrived in South Asia long before the creation of textual evidence that we can decipher with any confidence. Remarkable cave paintings have been preserved from Mesolithic sites dating from c. 30,000 BCE in Bhimbetka, near present-day Bhopal, in the Vindhya Mountains in the province of Madhya Pradesh.”
  19. Jump up^ Jones & Ryan (2006, p. xvii): “Some practices of Hinduism must have originated in Neolithic times (c. 4,000 BCE). The worship of certain plants and animals as sacred, for instance, could very likely have very great antiquity. The worship of goddesses, too, a part of Hinduism today, may be a feature that originated in the Neolithic.”
  20. Jump up^ Mallory 1989, p. 38f. The separation of the early Indo-Aryans from the Proto-Indo-Iranian stage is dated to roughly 1800 BCE in scholarship.
  21. Jump up^ Michaels (2004, p. 33): “They called themselves arya (“Aryans,” literally “the hospitable,” from the Vedic arya, “homey, the hospitable”) but even in the Rgveda, arya denotes a cultural and linguistic boundary and not only a racial one.”
  22. Jump up^ There is no exact dating possible for the beginning of the Vedic period. Witzel (1995, pp. 3–4) mentions a range between 1900 and 1400 BCE. Flood (1996, p. 21) mentions 1500 BCE.
  23. Jump up^ Allchin & Erdosy (1995): “There has also been a fairly general agreement that the Proto-Indoaryan speakers at one time lived on the steppes of Central Asia and that at a certain time they moved southwards through Bactria and Afghanistan, and perhaps the Caucasus, into Iran and India-Pakistan (Burrow 1973; Harmatta 1992).”
  24. Jump up^ Kulke & Rothermund (1998): “During the last decades intensive archaeological research in Russia and the Central Asian Republics of the former Soviet Union as well as in Pakistan and northern India has considerably enlarged our knowledge about the potential ancestors of the Indo-Aryans and their relationship with cultures in west, central and south Asia. Previous excavations in southern Russia and Central Asia could not confirm that the Eurasian steppes had once been the original home of the speakers of Indo-European language.”
  25. Jump up^ The Aryan migration theory has been challenged by some researchers (Michaels 2004, p. 33, Singh 2008, p. 186), due to a lack of archaeological evidence and signs of cultural continuity (Michaels 2004, p. 33), hypothesizing instead a slow process of acculturation or transformation (Michaels 2004, p. 33, Flood 1996, pp. 30–35). Nevertheless, linguistic and archaeological data clearly show a cultural change after 1750 BCE (Michaels 2004, p. 33), with the linguistic and religious data clearly showing links with Indo-European languages and religion (Flood 1996, p. 33). According to Singh 2008, p. 186, “The dominant view is that the Indo-Aryans came to the subcontinent as immigrants.”
  26. Jump up^ Zimmer’s point of view is supported by other scholars, such as Niniam Smart, in Doctrine and argument in Indian Philosophy, 1964, p.27-32 & p.76, (Crangle 1994, p. 7) and S.K. Belvakar & R.D. Ranade in History of Indian philosophy, 1974 (1927), p.81 & p.303-409 (Crangle 1994, p. 7).
  27. Jump up^ Flood (2008, pp. 273–274): “The second half of the first millennium BCE was the period that created many of the ideological and institutional elements that characterise later Indian religions. The renouncer tradition played a central role during this formative period of Indian religious history […] Some of the fundamental values and beliefs that we generally associate with Indian religions in general and Hinduism in particular were in part the creation of the renouncer tradition. These include the two pillars of Indian theologies: samsara – the belief that life in this world is one of suffering and subject to repeated deaths and births (rebirth); moksa/nirvana – the goal of human existence.”
  28. Jump up^ King (1999) notes that Radhakrishnan was a representative of Neo-Vedanta,[116] which had a specific understanding of Indian religions: “The inclusivist appropriation of other traditions, so characteristic of neo-Vedanta ideology, appears on three basic levels. First, it is apparent in the suggestion that the (Advaita) Vedanta philosophy of Sankara (c. eighth century CE) constitutes the central philosophy of Hinduism. Second, in an Indian context, neo-Vedanta philosophy subsumes Buddhist philosophies in terms of its own Vedantic ideology. The Buddha becomes a member of the Vedanta tradition, merely attempting to reform it from within. Finally, at a global level, neo-Vedanta colonises the religious traditions of the world by arguing for the centrality of a non-dualistic position as the philosophia perennis underlying all cultural differences.”
  29. Jump up^ Michaels (2004, p. 38): “At the time of upheaval [500-200 BCE], many elements of the Vedic religion were lost”.
  30. Jump up^ Hiltebeitel (2007, p. 13): “The emerging self-definitions of Hinduism were forged in the context of continuous interaction with heterodox religions (Buddhists, Jains, Ajivikas) throughout this whole period, and with foreign people (Yavanas, or Greeks; Sakas, or Scythians; Pahlavas, or Parthians; and Kusanas, or Kushans) from the third phase on [between the Mauryan empire and the rise of the Guptas].
  31. Jump up^ Larson (2009, p. 185): “[I]n contrast to the sruti, which “Hindus for the most part pay little more than lip service to.”
  32. Jump up^ Michaels (2004, p. 40) mentions the Durga temple in Aihole and the Visnu Temple in DeogarhMichell (1977, p. 18) notes that earlier temples were built of timber, brick and plaster, while the first stone temples appeared during the period of Gupta rule.
  33. Jump up^ Michaels (2004, p. 41):
  34. Jump up^ McRae (2003): This resembles the development of Chinese Chán during the An Lu-shan rebellion and the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms Period (907–960/979), during which power became decentralised end new Chán-schools emerged.
  35. Jump up^ Inden (1998, p. 67): “Before the eighth century, the Buddha was accorded the position of universal deity and ceremonies by which a king attained to imperial status were elaborate donative ceremonies entailing gifts to Buddhist monks and the installation of a symbolic Buddha in a stupa […] This pattern changed in the eighth century. The Buddha was replaced as the supreme, imperial deity by one of the Hindu gods (except under the Palas of eastern India, the Buddha’s homeland) […] Previously the Buddha had been accorded imperial-style worship (puja). Now as one of the Hindu gods replaced the Buddha at the imperial centre and pinnacle of the cosmo-political system, the image or symbol of the Hindu god comes to be housed in a monumental temple and given increasingly elaborate imperial-style puja worship.”
  36. Jump up^ Thapar (2003, p. 325): The king who ruled not by conquest but by setting in motion the wheel of law.
  37. Jump up^ Inden: “before the eighth century, the Buddha was accorded the position of universal deity and ceremonies by which a king attained to imperial status were elaborate donative ceremonies entailing gifts to Buddhist monks and the installation of a symbolic Buddha in a stupa….This pattern changed in the eighth century. The Buddha was replaced as the supreme, imperial deity by one of the Hindu gods (except under the Palas of eastern India, the Buddha’s homeland)…Previously the Buddha had been accorded imperial-style worship (puja). Now as one of the Hindu gods replaced the Buddha at the imperial centre and pinnacle of the cosmo-political system, the image or symbol of the Hindu god comes to be housed in a monumental temple and given increasingly elaborate imperial-style puja worship.”[147]
  38. Jump up^ The term “mayavada” is still being used, in a critical way, by the Hare Krshnas. See [web 7][web 8] [web 9] [web 10]
  39. Jump up^ See also “Aurangzeb, as he was according to Mughal Records”; more links at the bottom of that page; for Muslim historian’s record on major Hindu temple destruction campaigns, from 1193 to 1729 AD, see Richard Eaton (2000), Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States, Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pages 283-319
  40. Jump up^ The tendency of “a blurring of philosophical distinctions” has also been noted by Burley (2007, p. 34). Lorenzen locates the origins of a distinct Hindu identity in the interaction between Muslims and Hindus (Lorenzen 2006, pp. 24–33), and a process of “mutual self-definition with a contrasting Muslim other” which started well before 1800 (Lorenzen 2006, pp. 26–27). Both the Indian and the European thinkers who developed the term “Hinduism” in the 19th century were influenced by these philosophers (Nicholson 2010, p. 2)
  41. Jump up^ Many historians consider Attock to be the final frontier of the Maratha Empire.[175][page needed]
  42. Jump up^ This conjunction of nationalism and religion is not unique to India. The complexities of Asian nationalism are to be seen and understood in the context of colonialism, modernization and nation-building. See, for example, Anagarika Dharmapala, for the role of Theravada Buddhism in Sri Lankese struggle for independence (McMahan 2008), and D.T. Suzuki, who conjuncted Zen to Japanese nationalism and militarism, in defense against both western hegemony and the pressure on Japanese Zen during the Meiji Restoration to conform to Shinbutsu Bunri (Sharf 1993Sharf 1995).
  43. Jump up^ Rinehart (2004, p. 198): Neo-Vedanta also contributed to Hindutva ideology, Hindu politics and communalism. Yet, Rinehart emphasises that it is “clear that there isn’t a neat line of causation that leads from the philosophies of Rammohan Roy, Vivekananda and Radhakrishnan to the agenda of […] militant Hindus.”


  1. Jump up^ Ghurye: He [Hutton] considers modern Hinduism to be the result of an amalgam between pre-Aryan Indian beliefs of Mediterranean inspiration and the religion of the Rigveda. “The Tribal religions present, as it were, surplus material not yet built into the temple of Hinduism”.(Ghurye 1980, p. 4)
  2. Jump up^ Tyler, in India: An Anthropological Perspective(1973), page 68, as quoted by Sjoberg, calls Hinduism a “synthesis” in which the Dravidian elements prevail: “The Hindu synthesis was less the dialectical reduction of orthodoxy and heterodoxy than the resurgence of the ancient, aboriginal Indus civilization. In this process the rude, barbaric Aryan tribes were gradually civilised and eventually merged with the autochthonous Dravidians. Although elements of their domestic cult and ritualism were jealously preserved by Brahman priests, the body of their culture survived only in fragmentary tales and allegories embedded in vast, syncretistic compendia. On the whole, the Aryan contribution to Indian culture is insignificant. The essential pattern of Indian culture was already established in the third millennium B.C., and … the form of Indian civilization perdured and eventually reasserted itself (Sjoberg 1990, p. 43).
  3. Jump up^ Hopfe & Woodward (2008, p. 79): “The religion that the Aryans brought with them mingled with the religion of the native people, and the culture that developed between them became classical Hinduism.”
  4. Jump up^ Smart (2003, pp. 52, 83–86) distinguishes “Brahmanism” from the Vedic religion, connecting “Brahmanism” with the Upanishads.


  1. Jump up^ Brodd 2003.
  2. Jump up^ Fowler 1997, p. 1.
  3. Jump up^ Gellman 2011.
  4. Jump up^ Stevens 2001, p. 191.
  5. Jump up^ Sarma 1953.
  6. Jump up^ Merriam-Webster 2000, p. 751.
  7. Jump up^ Klostermaier 2007, p. 1.
  8. Jump up^ Laderman 2003, p. 119.
  9. Jump up^ Turner & 1996-B, p. 359.
  10. Jump up^ Smart 1993, p. 1.
  11. Jump up to:a b c Lockard 2007, p. 50.
  12. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 12.
  13. Jump up^ Samuel 2010, p. 193.
  14. Jump up to:a b c d e f g Flood 1996, p. 16.
  15. Jump up to:a b Narayanan 2009, p. 11.
  16. Jump up^ Osborne 2005, p. 9.
  17. Jump up^ Samuel 2010, p. 48-53.
  18. Jump up^ Lockard 2007, p. 52.
  19. Jump up^ Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 3.
  20. Jump up^ Jones 2006, p. xviii.
  21. Jump up to:a b c d Gomez 2013, p. 42.
  22. Jump up^ Michaels 2004, p. 32-36.
  23. Jump up^ Witzel 1995, p. 3-4.
  24. Jump up^ Flood 1996, p. 21.
  25. Jump up^ Michaels 2004, p. 38.
  26. Jump up to:a b Michaels 2004.
  27. Jump up^ Blackwell’s History of India; Stein 2010, page 107
  28. Jump up^ Some Aspects of Muslim Administration, Dr. R.P.Tripathi, 1956, p.24
  29. Jump up^ Samuel 2010, p. 41-42.
  30. Jump up to:a b White 2006, p. 28.
  31. Jump up^ Doniger 2010, p. 66.
  32. Jump up^ Jones & Ryan 2006, p. xvii.
  33. Jump up^ Narayanan 2009, p. 11; Lockard 2007, p. 52; Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 3; Jones & Ryan 2006, p. xviii
  34. Jump up^ Tiwari 2002, p. v; Lockard 2007, p. 52; Zimmer 1951, pp. 218–219; Larson 1995, p. 81
  35. Jump up^ Tiwari 2002, p. v.
  36. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Larson 2009.
  37. Jump up^ Fuller 2004, p. 88.
  38. Jump up to:a b Cousins 2010.
  39. Jump up to:a b Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 13.
  40. Jump up to:a b Vijay Nath 2001, p. 21.
  41. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h Vijay Nath 2001, p. 19.
  42. Jump up^ Samuel 2010, p. 193-228.
  43. Jump up^ Raju 1992, p. 31.
  44. Jump up^ Samuel 2010, p. 193-228, 339-353, specifically p.76-79 and p.199.
  45. Jump up^ Samuel 2010, p. 77.
  46. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Vijay Nath 2001.
  47. Jump up^ Vijay Nath 2001, p. 31-34.
  48. Jump up^ Flood 1996, p. 128, 129, 148.
  49. Jump up^ Gombrich 2006, p. 36.
  50. Jump up^ Thapar 1978, p. 19-20.
  51. Jump up to:a b c Thapar 1978, p. 19.
  52. Jump up^ Thapar 1978, p. 20.
  53. Jump up^ Basham 1967
  54. Jump up^ Frederick J. Simoons (1998). Plants of life, plants of death. p. 363.
  55. Jump up^ Ranbir Vohra (2000). The Making of India: A Historical Survey. M.E. Sharpe. p. 15.
  56. Jump up^ Grigoriĭ Maksimovich Bongard-Levin (1985). Ancient Indian Civilization. Arnold-Heinemann. p. 45.
  57. Jump up^ Steven Rosen, Graham M. Schweig (2006). Essential Hinduism. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 45.
  58. Jump up^ Srinivasan, Doris Meth (1997). Many Heads, Arms and Eyes: Origin, Meaning and Form in Multiplicity in Indian Art. Brill. ISBN 978-9004107588.
  59. Jump up^ Mahadevan, Iravatham (2006). A Note on the Muruku Sign of the Indus Script in light of the Mayiladuthurai Stone Axe Discovery. harappa.com. Archived from the original on 4 September 2006.
  60. Jump up^ Feuerstein, Georg; Kak, Subhash; Frawley, David (2001). In Search of the Cradle of Civilization:New Light on Ancient India. Quest Books. p. 121. ISBN 0-8356-0741-0.
  61. Jump up^ Clark, Sharri R. (2007). “The social lives of figurines: recontextualizing the third millennium BC terracotta figurines from Harappa, Pakistan”. Harvard PhD.
  62. Jump up^ Thapar, Romila, Early India: From the Origins to 1300, London, Penguin Books, 2002
  63. Jump up^ McIntosh, Jane. (2008) The Ancient Indus Valley : New Perspectives. ABC-CLIO. Page 84,276
  64. Jump up^ Pletcher, Kenneth (2010). The History of India. Britannica Educational Publishing. p. 60.
  65. Jump up^ Singh 2008, p. 185.
  66. Jump up^ Michaels 2004, p. 32.
  67. Jump up^ Anthony 2007.
  68. Jump up^ Mukherjee et al. 2011.
  69. Jump up^ Anthony 2007, p. 408.
  70. Jump up to:a b c d e f g Witzel 1995.
  71. Jump up^ Michaels 2004, p. 33.
  72. Jump up^ Flood 1996, p. 30-35.
  73. Jump up^ Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 5.
  74. Jump up^ Anthony 2007, p. 410-411.
  75. Jump up to:a b c Anthony 2007, p. 454.
  76. Jump up^ Anthony 2007, p. 375, 408-411.
  77. Jump up^ Samuel 2010, p. 41-48.
  78. Jump up^ Samuel 2010, p. 41-93.
  79. Jump up^ Stein 2010, p. 48-49.
  80. Jump up^ Samuel 2010, p. 61-93.
  81. Jump up to:a b c Samuel 2010.
  82. Jump up^ Samuel 2010, p. 53-56.
  83. Jump up^ Flood 1996, p. 30.
  84. Jump up^ Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 5-7.
  85. Jump up^ Roger D. Woodard (18 August 2006). Indo-European Sacred Space: Vedic and Roman Cult. University of Illinois Press. pp. 242–. ISBN 978-0-252-09295-4.
  86. Jump up to:a b c Beckwith 2009, p. 32.
  87. Jump up to:a b Anthony 2007, p. 462.
  88. Jump up^ Anthony 2007, p. 454-455.
  89. Jump up to:a b c Anthony 2007, p. 49.
  90. Jump up^ Anthony 2007, p. 50.
  91. Jump up^ Flood 2008, p. 68.
  92. Jump up^ Melton & Baumann 2010, p. 1412.
  93. Jump up^ Samuel 2010, p. 48-51, 61-93.
  94. Jump up^ Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 8-10.
  95. Jump up^ Basham 1989, p. 74-75.
  96. Jump up^ White, David Gordon (2003). Kiss of the Yogini. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 28. ISBN 0-226-89483-5.
  97. Jump up^ Singh 2008, p. 184.
  98. Jump up^ Flood 1996, p. 37.
  99. Jump up^ Witzel 1995, p. 4.
  100. Jump up^ Pandey, Rajbali, “Hindu Samskaras” (Motilal Banarasidass Publ., 1969)
  101. Jump up^ Fisher, Mary Pat (2008). Living Religions (7th edition). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc. p. 77.
  102. Jump up^ Indo-Iranian Studies: I by J.C. Tavadia, Vishva Bharati, Santiniketan, 1950
  103. Jump up^ (RV 8.5; 8.46; 8.56)
  104. Jump up^ Krishnananda. Swami. A Short History of Religious and Philosophic Thought in India, Divine Life Society. p. 21
  105. Jump up^ Holdrege (2004:215)
  106. Jump up^ Panikkar (2001) 350-351
  107. Jump up^ Day, Terence P. (1982). The Conception of Punishment in Early Indian Literature. Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. P. 42-45. ISBN 0-919812-15-5.
  108. Jump up^ Duchesne-Guillemin 1963, p. 46.
  109. Jump up to:a b Neusner, Jacob (2009), World Religions in America: An Introduction, Westminster John Knox Press, ISBN 978-0-664-23320-4
  110. Jump up^ Melton, J. Gordon; Baumann, Martin (2010), Religions of the World, Second Edition: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices, ABC-CLIO, p. 1324, ISBN 978-1-59884-204-3
  111. Jump up^ Mahadevan, T. M. P (1956), Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, ed., History of Philosophy Eastern and Western, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, p. 57
  112. Jump up^ Fowler, Jeaneane D. (1 February 2012). The Bhagavad Gita: A Text and Commentary for Students. Sussex Academic Press. pp. xxii–xxiii. ISBN 978-1-84519-346-1.
  113. Jump up^ Flood, Gavin D. (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press, p. 82, ISBN 978-0-521-43878-0
  114. Jump up^ Zimmer 1989, p. 217.
  115. Jump up^ Pratt, James Bissett (1996), The Pilgrimage of Buddhism and a Buddhist Pilgrimage, Asian Educational Services, p. 90, ISBN 978-81-206-1196-2
  116. Jump up to:a b c d e f King 1999.
  117. Jump up^ Staal, J. F. 1961. Nambudiri Veda Recitations Gravenhage.
  118. Jump up^ Staal, J. F. 1983. Agni: The Vedic ritual of the fire altar. 2 vols. Berkeley.
  119. Jump up^ Staal, Frits (1988), Universals: studies in Indian logic and linguistics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ISBN 0-226-76999-2
  120. Jump up to:a b Encyclopædia Britannica, Other sources: the process of “Sanskritization”.
  121. Jump up to:a b c Embree 1988, p. 277.
  122. Jump up^ Larson 2009, p. 185.
  123. Jump up^ Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 14.
  124. Jump up to:a b c d e Hiltebeitel 2002.
  125. Jump up to:a b c Hiltebeitel 2007, p. 20.
  126. Jump up^ Scheepers 2000.
  127. Jump up^ Raju 1992, p. 211.
  128. Jump up^ Radhakrishnan & Moore 1967, p. xviii–xxi
  129. Jump up to:a b c Michaels 2004, p. 40.
  130. Jump up^ Nakamura 2004, p. 687.
  131. Jump up to:a b Thapar 2003, p. 325.
  132. Jump up^ Sharma, Peri Sarveswara (1980). Anthology of Kumārilabhaṭṭa’s Works. Delhi, Motilal Banarsidass. p. 5.
  133. Jump up^ Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna (15 December 2011). Studies on the Carvaka/Lokayata. Anthem Press. p. 65. ISBN 978-0-85728-433-4.
  134. Jump up to:a b Embree, Ainslie Thomas; Stephen N. Hay; William Theodore De Bary (1988). Sources of Indian Tradition. Columbia University Press. p. 342. ISBN 978-0-231-06651-8.
  135. Jump up^ Flood 1996, p. 131.
  136. Jump up^ Jan Gonda, The Indian Religions in Pre-Islamic Indonesia and their survival in Bali, in Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 3 Southeast Asia, Religions, p. 1, at Google Books, pp. 1-54
  137. Jump up to:a b Michaels 2004, p. 41.
  138. Jump up^ White 2000, p. 25-28.
  139. Jump up to:a b c d e f g Michaels 2004, p. 42.
  140. Jump up to:a b c Vijay Nath 2001, p. 20.
  141. Jump up^ Thapar 2003, p. 325, 487.
  142. Jump up^ Flood 1996, p. 113.
  143. Jump up to:a b c d e Thapar 2003, p. 487.
  144. Jump up to:a b c Vijay Nath 2001, p. 31.
  145. Jump up^ Vijay Nath 2001, p. 31-32.
  146. Jump up^ Vijay Nath 2001, p. 32.
  147. Jump up^ Inden, Ronald. “Ritual, Authority, And Cycle Time in Hindu Kingship.” In JF Richards, ed., Kingship and Authority in South Asia. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998, p.67, 55
  148. Jump up^ Holt, John. The Buddhist Visnu. Columbia University Press, 2004, p.12,15 “The replacement of the Buddha as the “cosmic person” within the mythic ideology of Indian kingship, as we shall see shortly, occurred at about the same time the Buddha was incorporated and subordinated within the Brahmanical cult of Visnu.”
  149. Jump up^ Sharma 2000, p. 60-64.
  150. Jump up to:a b Raju 1992, p. 177-178.
  151. Jump up to:a b Renard 2010, p. 157.
  152. Jump up to:a b Comans 2000, p. 35-36.
  153. Jump up to:a b Raju 1992, p. 177.
  154. Jump up to:a b c Sharma 2000, p. 64.
  155. Jump up to:a b Popular Prakashan 2000, p. 52.
  156. Jump up^ Roosen 2006, p. 166.
  157. Jump up^ Francisco Rodríguez Adrados; Lukas de Blois; Gert-Jan van Dijk (2006). Mnemosyne, Bibliotheca Classica Batava: Supplementum. BRILL. pp. 707–708. ISBN 978-90-04-11454-8.
  158. Jump up^ O’Malley, Charles Donald (1970). The History of Medical Education: An International Symposium Held February 5-9, 1968. University of California Press. p. 352. ISBN 978-0-520-01578-4.
  159. Jump up to:a b Basham 1999
  160. Jump up^ Vincent A. Smith, The early history of India, 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, pages 381-384
  161. Jump up to:a b Will Durant (1976), The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage, Simon & Schuster, ISBN 978-0671548001, page 458-472, Quote: “The Mohammedan Conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precarious thing, whose delicate complex of order and liberty, culture and peace may at any time be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within. The Hindus had allowed their strength to be wasted in internal division and war; they had adopted religions like Buddhism and Jainism, which unnerved them for the tasks of life; they had failed to organize their forces for the protection of their frontiers and their capitals.”
  162. Jump up^ Gaborieau 1985
  163. Jump up to:a b Richard M. Eaton (2006), Slavery and South Asian History (Editors: Indrani Chatterjee, Richard M. Eaton), Indiana University Press, ISBN 0-253348102, page 11, Quote: “In 1562 Akbar abolished the practice of enslaving the families of war captives; his son Jahangir banned sending of slaves from Bengal as tribute in lieu of cash, which had been the custom since the 14th century. These measures notwithstanding, the Mughals actively participated in slave trade with Central Asia, deporting [Hindu] rebels and subjects who had defaulted on revenue payments, following precedents inherited from Delhi Sultanate”.
  164. Jump up^ Andre Wink (1991), Al-Hind: the Making of the Indo-Islamic World, Volume 1, Brill Academic, ISBN 978-9004095090, pages 14-16, 172-174, etc
  165. Jump up^ Sharma, Hari (1991), The real Tipu: a brief history of Tipu Sultan, Rishi publications, p. 112
  166. Jump up to:a b P Hardy (1977), Modern European and Muslim explanations of conversion to Islam in South Asia: A preliminary survey of the literature, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland, Volume 109, Issue 02, pages 177-206
  167. Jump up^ Burjor Avari (2013), Islamic Civilization in South Asia, Routledge, ISBN 978-0415580618, pages 66-70; Quote: “Many Hindu slaves converted to Islam and gained their liberty”.
  168. Jump up^ FHM Grapperhaus (2009), Taxes through the Ages, ISBN 978-9087220549, page 118
  169. Jump up^ Studies in Islamic History and Civilisation, David Ayalon, BRILL, 1986, p.271;ISBN 965-264-014-X
  170. Jump up^ J.T.F. Jordens, “Medieval Hindu Devotionalism” in & Basham 1999
  171. Jump up^ Nicholson 2010, p. 2.
  172. Jump up^ Michaels 2004, p. 44.
  173. Jump up^ Mehta 2005, p. 204.
  174. Jump up^ An Advanced History of Modern India By Sailendra Nath Sen, p.16
  175. Jump up^ Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Bharatiya Itihasa Samiti, Ramesh Chandra Majumdar – The History and Culture of the Indian People: The Maratha supremacy
  176. Jump up^ Andaman & Nicobar Origin | Andaman & Nicobar Island History. Andamanonline.in. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
  177. Jump up to:a b King 2002.
  178. Jump up^ King 2002, p. 118.
  179. Jump up^ Jones & Ryan 2006, p. 114.
  180. Jump up^ King 2002, pp. 119-120.
  181. Jump up^ King 2002, p. 123.
  182. Jump up^ Muesse 2011, p. 3-4.
  183. Jump up^ Doniger 2010, p. 18.
  184. Jump up^ Jouhki 2006, p. 10-11.
  185. Jump up^ Woodhead, Linda. Religions of the Modern World. Routledge. pp. 57, 58. ISBN 978-0-415-85881-6The term ‘Neo Hinduism’ has been applied to reformed Hinduism by Paul Hacker and others. According to Hacker, the ethcial values of Neo-Hinduism stem from Western philosophy and Christianity, although they are expressed in Hindu terms.
  186. Jump up^ “Fragments for the history of philosophy”, Parerga and Paralipomena, Volume I (1851).
  187. Jump up^ Fort 1998, p. 179.
  188. Jump up^ Minor 1987, p. 3.
  189. Jump up^ Ram-Prasad, C (2003). “Contemporary political Hinduism”. In Flood, GavinThe Blackwell Companion to HinduismBlackwell Publishing. pp. 526–550. ISBN 0-631-21535-2.
  190. Jump up^ Rinehart 2004, p. 196-197.




Further reading[edit]

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button